Christopher Clark praises Olaf Schultz: ‘I think that hesitation is absolutely correct’

Germany German Ukraine policy

Historian Christopher Clark praises “Olaf Schultz hit the right tune”

Christopher Clark is one of the world's most famous historians

Christopher Clark is one of the world’s most famous historians

Source: Oliver Berg / D

You can listen to the WELT podcast here

To view embedded content, your revocable consent to the transfer and processing of personal data is required, since such consent is required by embedded content providers as third-party providers [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. By setting the toggle switch to ON, you agree to this (which can be revoked at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to other countries, including the United States of America, in accordance with Section 49(1)(a) of the GDPR. You can find more information about this. You can withdraw your consent at any time via the toggle and via Privacy at the bottom of the page.

Christopher Clark in “The Sleepwalkers” analyzed the path to World War I. In the current Ukraine war, the award-winning historian now pays tribute to the German chancellor. “I think that frequency is absolutely correct,” he says.

HA tribute to Sir Christopher Clark: The Australian historian was awarded the Charlemagne Medal (“Medal Charlemagne”) in Aachen on Thursday. This speech honors “a distinguished historian of modern European history” who “has shown us over and over again why the world is sometimes different”.

The author of the critically acclaimed work “The Sleepwalkers” – an analysis of the genesis of World War I – swims against the tide in an interview in which he frankly criticized German Chancellor Olaf Schulz (SPD) and his cautious actions at the moment. Praise the Ukraine crisis.

“For Olaf Schultz: I think this hesitation is absolutely correct, as befits a statesman from a peace-loving nation,” the scientist working at the University of Cambridge told the German news agency DPA.

Read also

Author photo Photography NEU DIE WELT 27.09.-07.10.2016 Jack Schuster Photo: Claudius Pflug

It is “a bit perverted” if Germans are now expected to abandon their previous policies overnight. “Of course it takes time. And I think the process is already underway.” He cannot judge whether arms deliveries can be speeded up, but he supports the general line of Olaf Schultz.

Clarke calls for keeping in touch with Putin as well

“I think Olaf Schultz hit the right tune,” Clark continued. “I also think of his speech in Düsseldorf, drowned out by the shouts of the crowd, when he said: ‘It must have seemed ironic to a Ukrainian when asked to defend his country without weapons. That was a great moment.'”

He believes it is “absolutely necessary” that Schulz continue to speak with Russian President Vladimir Putin. “There is no other way.”

Clark (born 1960), who lives in England, is Professor of Modern European History at Cambridge. In the conversation at the awards ceremony in Aachen, Clarke was asked directly if he saw any similarities between the current situation and his most famous work. WELT documents the relevant section.

A question: Mr. Clark, are we sleepwalking into a world war like 1914?

Clark: I don’t see a strong analogy there, quite the opposite. What I wanted to do with the book at the time was to show that there is often no simple answer to how war broke out. It is often very complicated.

A question: So in your eyes there is no equivalent to 1914? Do you see differences more than similarities?

Clark: Before the outbreak of today’s war, I saw similarities: The cat-and-mouse game of troop mobilization reminded me a lot of the winter of 1911/12, when along the Austria-Hungary border the mobilizations of the Russian Empire and combat mobilization occurred over and over again. But other than that I mostly only see the differences.

A question: What are the differences?

ClarkThe European continent is not bilateral, divided into two major alliances. At the time, dividing Europe in two was a very fundamental part of the problem. Today, on the other hand, Russia is completely isolated on the European continent. In addition, the structure of the causes of this war is completely different, because this war began with a brutal act of military aggression, with the conquest of another country. It was very different in 1914. It started with a very difficult crisis surrounding an assassination attempt in Sarajevo. It’s something completely different now. There is an actor acting.

Leave a Comment